Implementation Insights
Retention patterns in current cohorts reinforce the same message we see across programs: when women farmers receive repeated follow-up that responds to real constraints, engagement stays stronger and program value is easier to verify.
Attendance still matters, but it is not the strongest sign of whether support is landing. Repeated contact and issue-based follow-up are proving more predictive of sustained participation.
This matters for partners who want honest retention signals rather than optimistic assumptions about one-off training sessions.
Programs need to budget for follow-up workflows and evidence capture, not just session delivery. The data should help managers spot where women are being lost from the service flow and why.